Last Will and Testament: Stephen Jay Gould’s The Structure of Evolutionary TheoryStephen Jay Gould, The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, , xxii + 1433

Philosophy of Science 70 (2):255-263 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I outline Gould's conception of evolutionary theory and his ways of contrasting it with contemporary Darwinism; a contemporary Darwinism that focuses on the natural selection of individual organisms. Gould argues for a hierarchical conception of the living world and of the evolutionary processes that have built that living world: organisms are built from smaller components and are themselves components of groups, populations, species, lineages. Selection, drift and constraint are important to all of these levels of biological organization, not just that of individual organisms. Moreover, both drift and constraint are more important than orthodoxy supposes. While having some sympathy for both of these lines of argument, I argue that they are more problematic than Gould supposes, and that he understates the power and the heterogeneity of orthodox conceptions of life's evolution.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Radicals and revolution: The structure of evolutionary theory Stephen Jay Gould; Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA & London, 2002, pp. xxi+ 1433, Price $39.95 hardback, ISBN 0-674-00613-5. [REVIEW]Mark E. Borrello - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35 (1):209-216.
Gould’s Laws.Chris Haufe - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (1):1-20.
Claiming Darwin: Stephen Jay Gould in contests over evolutionary orthodoxy and public perception, 1977–2002.Myrna Perez Sheldon - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 45 (1):139-147.
Evolutionary theory and the social uses of biology.Philip Kitcher - 2004 - Biology and Philosophy 19 (1):1-15.
Stephen Jay Gould: Did He Bring Paleontology to the "High Table"?Donald Prothero - 2009 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 1 (20130604).
Methodological and contextual factors in the dawkins/gould dispute over evolutionary progress.Timothy Shanahan - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (1):127-151.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-31

Downloads
9 (#1,224,450)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kim Sterelny
Australian National University

Citations of this work

Seven types of adaptationism.Tim Lewens - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (2):161-182.
An explication of the causal dimension of drift.Peter Gildenhuys - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):521-555.
How should we distinguish between selectable and circumstantial traits?Ciprian Jeler - 2024 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 46 (1):1-22.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references