Assessment of relative importance of S + and S − after various stages of training

&
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (6):462-464 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3758/bf03333300

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Assessment of the relative importance of S+ and S− in rats, using intercurrent simultaneous and successive discriminations.David A. Stevens, J. Russell Mason & D. R. Wixon - 1981 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 17 (4):200-202.
Relative resistance to extinction of escape training and avoidance training.Fred D. Sheffield & Helena Wellisz Temmer - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (3):287.
Evolution and Constraints on Variation: Variant Specification and Range of Assessment.Trevor Pearce - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (5):739-751.
Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and its Applications.John MacFarlane - 2014 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Relative Correctness.Teresa Marques - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):361-373.
An analysis of Hong Kong auditors' perceptions of the importance of selected red flag factors in risk assessment.Abdul Majid, Ferdinand A. Gul & Judy S. L. Tsui - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 32 (3):263 - 274.
Effects of task complexity and task organization on the relative efficiency of part and whole training methods.James C. Naylor & George E. Briggs - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (3):217.
Logical Problems for Lockean Persons.David Welker - 1984 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 21 (1):115-132.
Commercialization, patents and moral assessment of biotechnology products.Rogeer Hoedemaekers - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (3):273 – 284.
A sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness.Michael D. Mumford, Shane Connelly, Ryan P. Brown, Stephen T. Murphy, Jason H. Hill, Alison L. Antes, Ethan P. Waples & Lynn D. Devenport - 2008 - Ethics and Behavior 18 (4):315 – 339.
Articles: Ethical training in sport psychology programs: Current training standards.I. I. Watson, Samuel Zizzi & Edward F. Etzel - 2006 - Ethics and Behavior 16 (1):5 – 14.
The relative importance of social responsibility in determining organizational effectiveness: Student responses. [REVIEW]Kenneth L. Kraft - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (3):315 - 326.
Choices based on redundant information: An analysis of two-dimensional stimulus control.Sheila Chase & Eric G. Heinemann - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 92 (2):161.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
15 (#926,042)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Memory for frequency as a function of environmental context.Ed Eckert, N. Jack Kanak & Rick Stevens - 1984 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22 (6):507-510.

Add more references