Richard Hooker “The Pelagian”. Is There A Case? Notes On The Christian Letter

Perichoresis 11 (2):1-11 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this reflection paper, the author considers the language and content relating to the sacred and the transcendent and the expectations arising from such language. Contending that its secular usage is sufficiently unreferenced author asks whether such language can still be used in Christian discourse which by nature is particular. The author concludes that human discourse on transcendence is common to all people in various ways sometimes mutually inclusive yet often exclusive. Christian discourse is able to use the terms available to depict the essence of human desire but historically has defended the particularity of biblical language as necessary to preserve its Christological imperative which is its distinctive departure from secular appropriation of mystery

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Richard Hooker And The Later Puritans.John K. Stafford - 2013 - Perichoresis 11 (2):38-49.
Richard Hooker's Pneumatologia.John K. Stafford - 2013 - Perichoresis 11 (2):12-37.
Kant on grace: A reply to his critics.Jacqueline Mariña - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (4):379-400.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-24

Downloads
12 (#1,078,270)

6 months
11 (#231,656)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references