Konflikt interesu publicznego z prywatnym na tle instytucji wywłaszczenia nieruchomości

Annales. Ethics in Economic Life 15:221-229 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ownership, as a basic value of a legal state is the subject to special protection guaranteed by a basic law. However, in certain situations acting for the benefit of public interest is, according to a legislator, takes priority over private ownership. Thus, in cases when public interest is at stake limitation of ownership title to property can be permitted by regulations. Expropriation of private property for the sake of public good is the solution used for many years in Poland and in other countries. Basic preconditions for expropriation are described in art. 21 section 2 of The Constitution of the Republic of Poland. Private ownership in art. 21 of Polish Constitution was defined in a very general context without defining the subject. Thus, all the ownership is the subject to state protection without specifying the principles of this protection, which are regulated by ordinary acts. Guaranteeing right to private ownership does not mean the right is inviolable. Constitution allows for property expropriation for the benefit of public purposes after a just compensation. However, it must be emphasized that regulations relating to the rules of property expropriation as a special form of depriving ownership right by means of authoritarian state act, which is the exception from general civil and legal principles of transferring ownership title, must be applied literally, excluding admissibility of extensive interpretation. Provisions of the constitution are defined in the regulations of the Real Estate Management Act from 21st August 1997.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Self-Interest and Public Interest: The Motivations of Political Actors.Michael C. Munger - 2011 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 23 (3):339-357.
Self-interest and public interest: The motivations of political actors.Michael C. Munger - 2011 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 23 (3):339-357.
Protection of Collective-owned Land Property and Misery Index of Eminent Domain.Guang-hua Zhu & Jian-wei Gao - 2009 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1:59-68.
Structuring legal institutions.Dick W. P. Ruiter - 1998 - Law and Philosophy 17 (3):215 - 232.
Expropriation of the expropriators.Jacob Blumenfeld - 2023 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 49 (4):1-17.
Is euthyphronics the ethics of interest?(Czy eutofronika jest etyka interesu?).Nierodka Pawel - 2009 - Archeus. Studia Z Bioetyki I Antropologii Filozoficznej 10:81-93.
Conceptualizing institutions.Corrado Roversi - 2014 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (1):201-215.
Institution and passivity: course notes from the Collège de France (1954-1955).Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 2010 - Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press. Edited by Claude Lefort, Dominique Darmaillacq, Stéphanie Ménasé, Leonard Lawlor, Heath Massey & Maurice Merleau-Ponty.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-10

Downloads
4 (#1,623,074)

6 months
3 (#973,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references