Interest‐Relative Invariantism versus Relativism

In Knowledge and practical interests. New York: Oxford University Press (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Relativism about knowledge-attributions is the thesis that knowledge attributions express propositions the truth of which is relative to a judge. On this view, a knowledge attribution may express a proposition that is true for one judge, and false for another. This chapter explains and criticizes various versions of relativism about knowledge attributions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two Kinds of Stakes.Alex Worsnip - 2015 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (3):307-324.
Relativism and knowledge attributions.John MacFarlane - 2010 - In Sven Bernecker & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Epistemology. New York: Routledge. pp. 536--544.
Knowledge in and out of context.Kent Bach - 2010 - In Joseph Campbell (ed.), Knowledge and Skepticism. MIT Press. pp. 105--36.
On the linguistic basis for contextualism.Jason Stanley - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 119 (1-2):119-146.
Knowing Future Contingents.Ezio Di Nucci - 2012 - Logos and Episteme 3 (1):43-50.
Contextualism.Jason Stanley - 2005 - In Knowledge and practical interests. New York: Oxford University Press.
Interest-Relative Invariantism. [REVIEW]Stephen Schiffer - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (1):188 - 195.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
1 (#1,722,932)

6 months
1 (#1,912,481)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jason Stanley
Yale University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references