Quinian bootstrapping or Fodorian combination? Core and constructed knowledge of number

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):149-150 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to Carey (2009), humans construct new concepts by abstracting structural relations among sets of partly unspecified symbols, and then analogically mapping those symbol structures onto the target domain. Using the development of integer concepts as an example, I give reasons to doubt this account and to consider other ways in which language and symbol learning foster conceptual development

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How to improve on Quinian bootstrapping – a response to nativist objections.Zoltan Jakab - 2013 - Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
The origin of concepts.Susan Carey - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Toward a defensible bootstrapping.Sam Mitchell - 1995 - Philosophy of Science 62 (2):241-260.
Beyond the Building Blocks Model.Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):139-140.
Science and Core Knowledge.Susan Carey & Elizabeth Spelke - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (4):515 - 533.
The Bootstrapping Problem.Jonathan Weisberg - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (9):597-610.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
73 (#224,819)

6 months
9 (#301,354)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?