Expanding Observability via Human-Machine Cooperation

Axiomathes 32 (3):819-832 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We ask how to use machine learning to expand observability, which presently depends on human learning that informs conceivability. The issue is engaged by considering the question of correspondence between conceived observability counterfactuals and observable, yet so far unobserved or unconceived, states of affairs. A possible answer lies in importing out of reference frame content which could provide means for conceiving further observability counterfactuals. They allow us to define high-fidelity observability, increasing the level of correspondence in question. To achieve high-fidelity observability, we propose to use generative machine learning models as the providers of the out of reference frame content. From an applied point of view, such a role of generative machine learning models shows an emerging dimension of human-machine cooperation.

Similar books and articles

Human Semi-Supervised Learning.Bryan R. Gibson, Timothy T. Rogers & Xiaojin Zhu - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):132-172.
Observability and Observation in Physical Science.Peter Kosso - 1986 - Dissertation, University of Minnesota

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-05

Downloads
340 (#62,737)

6 months
159 (#25,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Petr Spelda
Charles University, Prague

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Does conceivability entail possibility.David J. Chalmers - 2002 - In Tamar Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 145--200.
Is conceivability a guide to possibility?Stephen Yablo - 1993 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (1):1-42.
Explanation and invariance in the special sciences.James Woodward - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (2):197-254.

View all 21 references / Add more references