Why to argue about proper names?

Filosoficky Casopis 47 (5):827-833 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Proč se přít o vlastních jménech?Prokop SousedÍk - 1999 - Filosoficky Casopis 47:827-833.
Sousedík a Frege o vlastných menách.Marián Zouhar - 1998 - Filosoficky Casopis 46:1015-1023.
Sousedik unsuccessful criticism.L. Hejdanek - 1992 - Filosoficky Casopis 40 (4):677-680.
Do proper names have meaning?P. Sousedik - 1998 - Filosoficky Casopis 46 (2):245-260.
Mají vlastní jména smysl?Prokop SousedÍk - 1998 - Filosoficky Casopis 46:245-260.
O Vlastných Menách, Informatívnosti A Niektorých Nejasnostiach.Marián Zouhar - 1999 - Filosoficky Casopis 47:669-678.
Protipříklady proti kauzální teorii vlastních jmen.Jiří RaclavskÝ - 2005 - Filosoficky Casopis 53:669-690.
Na obranu kauzálnej teórie referencie vlastných mien.Marián Zouhar - 2006 - Filosoficky Casopis 54:70-84.
"The natural rightness of names in Plato's" Cratylus".B. Svandova - 2001 - Filosoficky Casopis 49 (3):471-485.
"Bolzano's" Theory of Science Proper".K. Berka - 1998 - Filosoficky Casopis 46 (6):931-947.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references