Interpreting legal texts: What is, and what is not, special about the law

Abstract

To be presented at an International Conference on Law, Language, and Interpretation, at the University of Akureyri, Akureyri, Iceland, April 1-2, 2007.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Essay fifteen. Interpreting legal texts: What is, and what is not, special about the law.Scott Soames - 2008 - In Philosophical Essays, Volume 1: Natural Language: What It Means and How We Use It. Princeton University Press. pp. 403-424.
Philosophical Essays: Natural Language: What It Means and How We Use It.Scott Soames - 2009 - Princeton University Press.
The Ninth International Saga Conference. The Contemporary sagas. Akureyri, 1994.Sverrir Tómasson (ed.) - 1994 - Reykjavík: Stofnun Árna Magnússonar.
Joan Wallach Scott: The Politics of the Veil: Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2007, 208 pp, Price £19.95 , ISBN 978-1-4008-2789-3. [REVIEW]Brenna Bhandar - 2009 - Feminist Legal Studies 17 (3):345-351.
Anything New Under the Sun? Legal Clarifications as a Polish New Tool for Interpreting Business Law.Anna Piszcz - 2020 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 33 (3):601-616.
Law and economics: Association for Legal and Social Philosophy, Fourteenth Annual Conference, the Queen's University of Belfast, 2-4 April 1987.Robert N. Moles (ed.) - 1988 - Wiesbaden: F. Steiner.
The nature of legal interpretation: what jurists can learn about legal interpretation from linguistics and philosophy.Brian G. Slocum (ed.) - 2017 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
What Role Should Propositions Have in the Theory of Meaning? Review Essay: Scott Soames. What is meaning?: Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010. Pp. ix, 132.Kirk Ludwig - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (4):885-901.
Can Legal Practice Adjudicate Between Theories of Vagueness?Asgeirsson Hrafn - 2016 - In Hrafn Asgeirsson (ed.), Vagueness and Law: Philosophical and Legal Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 95–126.
Review of Scott Soames, Philosophical Essays, Volume 1: Natural Language: What It Means and How We Use It. [REVIEW]Gary Ostertag - 2010 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (7).

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Scott Soames
University of Southern California

Citations of this work

Paraphrase, Semantics, and Ontology.John A. Keller - 2015 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 9.
Default Reasoning and the Law: A Dialogue.Penco Carlo & Canale Damiano - 2022 - Revus. Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law / Revija Za Ustavno Teorijo in Filozofijo Prava 47.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references