The Interpretation of the Factorizability Condition of Bell's Theorem: Implications for Locality and Causality in Quantum Mechanics

Dissertation, Indiana University (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bell's theorem shows that it is not possible to give a local contextual hidden variables interpretation of quantum theory. This conclusion is based on the conflict between Bell's inequality and the predictions of quantum mechanics. A version of Bell's inequality can be derived from a mathematical condition called factorizability. The violation of Bell's inequality implies the violation of factorizability. Factorizability asserts the independence, relative to hidden variables, lambda, of probabilities of outcomes of spin measurements on correlated particle pairs in separated systems experiments. Factorizability was initially interpreted as a locality condition on the basis of the space-like separation of the particles at the time of measurement. ;Jarrett showed that factorizability is logically equivalent to the conjunction of two mathematical conditions called parameter independence and outcome independence . PI has been interpreted as a locality condition. OI has been interpreted as involving assumptions about completeness, separability, and causality, yielding interpretations of the violation of Bell's inequality involving incompleteness, nonseparability, and the rejection of causality. ;It is shown here that all these interpretations rely on a basic set of underlying assumptions concerning the nature and behavior of quantum systems: quantum systems are physical bodies with localized spatial extension; quantum systems have properties independent of observation or measurement; quantum systems exist in space-time and propagate in a spatio-temporally continuous manner through space-time; genuine statistical correlations have causal implications which entail some kind of causal connection between the physical circumstances of systems and outcomes of measurement. ;Eachinterpretation of OI arrives at its conclusion about the implications of Bell's theorem by rejecting one of these basic assumptions, while retaining the remaining assumptions. The conjunction of these assumptions amounts to the attempt to fit the behavior of quantum systems into the mathematical structure of events in the four-dimensional space-time manifold. It appears that this mathematical structure is incompatible with the mathematical structure of quantum mechanics, and this incompatibility may be responsible for the conceptual difficulties that arise in interpreting Bell's theorem

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophical Implications of Bell's Theorem.Niall Shanks - 1987 - Dissertation, University of Alberta (Canada)
Quantum Locality.Robert B. Griffiths - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (4):705-733.
Correlations and Physical Locality.Arthur Fine - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:535 - 562.
Locality, Bell's theorem, and quantum mechanics.Peter Rastall - 1985 - Foundations of Physics 15 (9):963-972.
Bell’s Theorem: Two Neglected Solutions.Louis Vervoort - 2013 - Foundations of Physics 43 (6):769-791.
Quantum Life: Interaction, Entanglement, and Separation.Eric Winsberg - 2003 - Journal of Philosophy 100 (2):80 - 97.
About a Generalization of Bell's Inequality.V. M. González-Robles - 2003 - Foundations of Physics 33 (5):839-853.
Bell's theorem, inference, and quantum transactions.A. J. M. Garrett - 1990 - Foundations of Physics 20 (4):381-402.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references