Towards a theory of offense

Philosophical Explorations 26 (3):391-403 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We are all familiar with claims about being offended. There is reason to think that taking offense is particularly characteristic of the moral psychology of our times. When someone claims offense, others are supposed to take notice. This suffices to make offense a topic of philosophical and practical interest. However, we lack a persuasive account of the nature of offense. The present partial theory of offense portrays typical offense experiences as negative feelings interpreted as responses to something offensive.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-06

Downloads
52 (#315,228)

6 months
14 (#200,872)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Sneddon
University of Ottawa

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Emotion.Ronald de Sousa - 2007 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Emotions and Choice.Robert C. Solomon - 1973 - Review of Metaphysics 27 (1):20 - 41.
A Tear is an Intellectual Thing: The Meanings of Emotion.Jerome Neu - 2000 - New York, USA: Oxford University Press USA.
VIII. The significance of recalcitrant emotion.Justin D'arms - 2003 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 52:127-145.

View all 15 references / Add more references