Utilitas 12 (1):41-61 (2000)

Mill's feminism has been attacked as being logically incoherent. The general verdict has been that Mill can easily be defended from the charge. However, both sides in the debate have ignored the fact that his feminism is part of a broader theory of liberal empiricism. Placing The Subjection of Women in this context re–opens the question of its logical credentials and reveals a basic weakness in Millian feminism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0953820800002600
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,039
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Stove on Mill on Women.Inari Thiel - 1994 - Philosophy 69 (267):100 - 101.
Slavery, Contentment, and Social Freedom.G. W. Smith - 1977 - Philosophical Quarterly 27 (108):236-248.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mill and the Subjection of Women.Julia Annas - 1977 - Philosophy 52 (200):179 - 194.
Mill's the Subjection of Women: Critical Essays.Maria H. Morales (ed.) - 2005 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Essays on Sex Equality.John Stuart Mill & Harriet Taylor Mill - 1970 - University of Chicago Press.
Only X%: The Problem of Sex Equality.Janet Radcliffe Richards - 2014 - Journal of Practical Ethics 2 (1):44-67.


Added to PP index

Total views
101 ( #115,719 of 2,505,228 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,579 of 2,505,228 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes