Probabilities of electoral outcomes: from three-candidate to four-candidate elections

Theory and Decision 88 (2):205-229 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to compute the theoretical likelihood of some electoral outcomes under the impartial anonymous culture in four-candidate elections by using the last versions of software like LattE or Normaliz. By comparison with the three-candidate case, our results allow to analyze the impact of the number of candidates on the occurrence of these voting outcomes.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-14

Downloads
17 (#896,762)

6 months
4 (#862,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Condorcet's paradox.William V. Gehrlein - 1983 - Theory and Decision 15 (2):161-197.
Appendix.[author unknown] - 1993 - The Personalist Forum 9 (1):53-61.
The Theory of Committees and Elections.Duncan Black - 1961 - Philosophy 36 (137):248-249.

Add more references