Laws of nature and cosmic coincidences

Philosophical Quarterly 35 (140):272-280 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Laws, coincidences, and relations between universals.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1987 - In John Jamieson Carswell Smart, Philip Pettit, Richard Sylvan & Jean Norman (eds.), Metaphysics and Morality: Essays in Honour of J. J. C. Smart. New York, NY, USA: Blackwell.
Smart and the secondary qualities.David M. Armstrong - 1987 - In John Jamieson Carswell Smart, Philip Pettit, Richard Sylvan & Jean Norman (eds.), Metaphysics and Morality: Essays in Honour of J. J. C. Smart. New York, NY, USA: Blackwell.
The mind-brain identity theory: a collection of papers.Clive Vernon Borst - 1970 - New York,: St Martin's P.. Edited by D. M. Armstrong.
Sensations and Brain Processes: A Reply to J. J. C. Smart.John T. Stevenson - 1960 - Philosophical Review 69 (October):505-10.
Laws of nature, cosmic coincidences and scientific realism.Marc Lange - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (4):614 – 638.
Smart and the secondary qualities.D. M. Armstrong - 1987 - In John Jamieson Carswell Smart, Philip Pettit, Richard Sylvan & Jean Norman (eds.), Metaphysics and Morality: Essays in Honour of J. J. C. Smart. New York, NY, USA: Blackwell.
Introductions.[author unknown] - 2008 - Philosophical Books 38 (3):215-224.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
147 (#29,313)

6 months
7 (#1,397,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jack Smart
Last affiliation: Monash University

Citations of this work

Unification, explanation, and the composition of causes in Newtonian mechanics.Malcolm R. Forster - 1988 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 19 (1):55-101.
Is the God Hypothesis Improbable? A Response to Dawkins.Logan Paul Gage - 2020 - In Kevin Vallier & Joshua Rasmussen (eds.), A New Theist Response to the New Atheists. New York: Routledge. pp. 59-76.
What’s at the bottom of scientific realism?Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):625-628.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references