Correction to: Should Animalists Be “Transplanimalists”?

Axiomathes 31 (1):125-125 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the original publication, the second sentence of foot note 11 and final sentence of foot note 46 have been published incorrectly. The corrected foot notes are given in this correction.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Animalists Should Say About Animals.Andrew Higgins - 2015 - Southwest Philosophy Review 31 (2):109-124.
Strategy for Animalism.Joungbin Lim - 2018 - Axiomathes 28 (4):419-433.
Animalism.Andrew M. Bailey - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (12):867-883.
The Problems of Correction of the Official Constitutional Doctrine.Egidijus Jarašiūnas - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 115 (1):39-70.
Correction to: On Harman’s theory of knowledge.Joseph Margolis - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (7):1827-1827.
Bodily Thought and the Corpse Problem.Steinvör Thöll Árnadóttir - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):575-592.
Unrestricted animalism and the too many candidates problem.Eric Yang - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (3):635-652.
Thinking Animals and the Thinking Parts Problem.Joshua L. Watson - 2016 - Philosophical Quarterly 66 (263):323-340.
Correction and reanalysis.Norman H. Anderson & David A. Grant - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (5):453.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-16

Downloads
12 (#1,079,938)

6 months
2 (#1,185,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dominic R Mangino
University of California, Los Angeles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references