Or why the ethical principle on which human equality rests requires us to extend equal consideration to animals too

In Ruth F. Chadwick & Doris Schroeder (eds.), Applied ethics: critical concepts in philosophy. New York: Routledge. pp. 4--51 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Singer, Peter (1946-).Anthony Skelton - 2014 - In Michael T. Gibbons (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 3454-3455.
The Definition of Racism.W. Thomas Schmid - 1996 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (1):31-40.
Rights, interests, and moral equality.Meredith Williams - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (2):149-161.
Rights, Interests, and Moral Equality.Meredith Williams - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (2):149-161.
The Ethical Vegetarianism Argument.Robert L. Muhlnickel - 2011-09-16 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 265–268.
Peter Singer and the Moral Status of Animals. A Critical Assessment.Francesco Allegri - 2017 - Ragion Pratica: Rivista semestrale 48:pp. 117-140.
Is Peter Singer inconsistent in his ethics?Prabhu Venkataraman & Tanuja Kalita - 2014 - Cadernos Do Pet Filosofia 5 (10):45-52.
Book Reviews. [REVIEW]J. Horton - 2002 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):225-233.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
20 (#759,414)

6 months
1 (#1,722,083)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references