Moral theories and tests of adequacy

Philosophical Quarterly 31 (122):31-46 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2218676

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Evaluating Moral Theories.Lansing Pollock - 1988 - American Philosophical Quarterly 25 (3):229 - 240.
On the philosophical adequacy of set theories.Carlos E. Alchourrón - 1987 - Theoria 2 (2):567-574.
Central Concepts of "Jane Eyre".Martin S. Day - 1960 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 41 (4):495.
Jane Austen to the modern realists.Julia Johnson Davis - 1930 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 11 (3):177.
Feedback from moral philosophy to cognitive science.Regina A. Rini - 2015 - Philosophical Psychology 28 (4):569-588.
Metaethical Principles, Meta-Prescriptions, and Moral Theories.Terrance McConnell - 1985 - American Philosophical Quarterly 22 (4):299 - 309.
Dispositional Theories of Value Meet Moral Twin Earth.Sean Holland - 2001 - American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (2):177 - 195.
Formal and material theories in philosophy of science: a methodological interpretation.Alan Love - 2011 - In Henk W. de Regt (ed.), EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer. pp. 175--185.
The Singleton enigma.Catherine Z. Elgin - 1992 - Philosophical Books 33 (4):193-198.
Mirrors to One Another: Emotion and Value in Jane Austen and David Hume – E.M. Dadlez. [REVIEW]Sandrine Berges - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (241):864-865.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
24 (#645,203)

6 months
6 (#701,126)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references