Internalization and moral demands

Philosophical Studies 157 (2):163-175 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How should we assess the burden of moral demands? A predominant assessment is provided by what Murphy calls the baseline of factual status-quo (FSQ): A moral theory is demanding if the level of agents’ well-being is reduced from the time they begin to comply perfectly with the theory. The aims of my paper are threefold. I will first discuss the limits of the FSQ baseline. Second, I suggest a different assessment, which examines moral demands from a whole-life perspective. My view is that even if agents’ compliance with a moral theory will not cause a substantial reduction to their existing level of well-being, the total quality of life that they may obtain from complying with this theory may still be lower than what they could have obtained by following some other moral theories. The third aim of this paper is that, through this investigation, I hope to explicate the relation between agents’ acceptance of a moral theory and the burden of demands that is created by it. I believe that we can achieve a more comprehensive understanding of the nature of moral demands by paying attention to the psychological development of agents as they accept and internalize a moral theory

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral demands in nonideal theory.Liam B. Murphy - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The demands of beneficence.Liam Murphy - 1993 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (4):267-292.
What reason demands.Rüdiger Bittner - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Moral Commitment and Moral Theory.Sarah Stroud - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Research 26:381-398.
Moral Competence, Moral Blame, and Protest.Matthew Talbert - 2012 - The Journal of Ethics 16 (1):89-109.
GM and corporate responsibility.Richard T. George - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (3):177 - 179.
The Educational Demands of a Philosophical Theory of Moral Conscience in a Modern Democracy.Vasiliki Karavakou - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 4:65-71.
Oughts and Cans.Judith Lichtenberg - 2010 - Philosophical Topics 38 (1):123-142.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-18

Downloads
86 (#189,229)

6 months
6 (#403,662)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Caring for parents: a consequentialist approach.William Sin - 2016 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (1):3-10.
Sacrifice and Relational Well-Being.Vanessa Carbonell - 2018 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 26 (3):335-353.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Ethics and the limits of philosophy.Bernard Williams - 1985 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Oxford University Press USA.
Famine, affluence, and morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.
Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy.Bernard Williams - 1985 - Cambridge, Mass.: Routledge.

View all 48 references / Add more references