One Hundred Years without Darwin are Enough

Abstract

uppose that the most fundamental and general principle of a science had been known for over a century and had long since become a main basis for understanding and research by scientists in that field. You would surely assume that the principle would be taken as a matter of course by everyone with even a nodding acquaintance with the science. It would obviously be taught everywhere as basic to the science at any level of education. If you think that about biology, however, you are wrong.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Closure On Skepticism.Sherrilyn Roush - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy 107 (5):243-256.
2014 John Dewey Lecture: Does Evidence Matter?Diane Ravitch - 2015 - Education and Culture 31 (1):3.
Whether and Where to Give.Theron Pummer - 2016 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 44 (1):77-95.
Thinking through language.Paul Bloom & Frank C. Keil - 2001 - Mind and Language 16 (4):351–367.
Interrogation of Carl Schmitt by Robert Kempner (I).Carl Schmitt - 1987 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1987 (72):97-129.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
20 (#792,731)

6 months
2 (#1,259,626)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references