Sex and Somaesthetics

In James Behuniak (ed.), Appreciating the Chinese Difference: Engaging Roger T. Ames on Methods, Issues, and Roles. Albany: SUNY Press. pp. 91-110 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1515/9781438471013-006

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Richard Shusterman (2021). Ars Erotica: Sex and Somaesthetics in the Classical Arts of Love. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Luis Miguel Villalba Cívico - 2024 - RAPHISA REVISTA DE ANTROPOLOGÍA Y FILOSOFÍA DE LO SAGRADO 7 (1):131-133.
Ars Erotica: Sex and Somaesthetics in the Classical Arts of Love.Mary Bittner Wiseman - 2022 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 80 (2):255-258.
Ars Erotica: Sex and Somaesthetics in the Classical Arts of Love.Andrew Edgar - 2022 - British Journal of Aesthetics 62 (1):143-146.
Ars Erotica: Sex and Somaesthetics in the Classical Arts of Love.Richard Shusterman - 2021 - New York/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beauty between Repression and Coercion: A Few Thoughts on Richard Shusterman’s Ars Erotica: Sex and Somaesthetics in the Classical Arts of Love.Leszek Koczanowicz - 2021 - Foucault Studies 31.
Critical Notice of Richard Shusterman, Ars Erotica. Sex and Somaesthetics in the Classical Arts of Love.Barbara Formis - 2023 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 15 (2).
Ars erotica: Sex and somaesthetics in the classical arts of loveRichard Shusterman Cambridge University Press, 2021. Pp. vii + 420. [REVIEW]Mark Tschaepe - 2022 - Metaphilosophy 53 (4):560-564.
Roger T. Ames Responds.Roger T. Ames - 2018 - In James Behuniak (ed.), Appreciating the Chinese Difference: Engaging Roger T. Ames on Methods, Issues, and Roles. Albany: SUNY Press. pp. 249-293.
Roger T. Ames and the Meaning of Confucianism.Thomas P. Kasulis - 2018 - In James Behuniak (ed.), Appreciating the Chinese Difference: Engaging Roger T. Ames on Methods, Issues, and Roles. Albany: SUNY Press. pp. 13-29.
Contributors.Jim Behuniak - 2018 - In James Behuniak (ed.), Appreciating the Chinese Difference: Engaging Roger T. Ames on Methods, Issues, and Roles. Albany: SUNY Press. pp. 295-299.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-10

Downloads
2 (#1,818,315)

6 months
2 (#1,259,919)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Shusterman
Florida Atlantic University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references