Problems and Prospects for Democratic Settlements: South Africa as a Model for the Middle East and Northern Ireland?

Politics and Society 33 (2):277-326 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Intense ethnic, racial, and religious violence led many to classify South Africa, Northern Ireland, and Israel/palestine as intractable conflicts. Yet they diverged, with only South Africa achieving a lasting settlement. The authors explain why. The authors analyze them as a distinctive type of negotiated transition. The ancién regime is an imperfect democracy, subject to electoral constraints and legitimated by democratic principles that it violates. This constrains negotiations but helps manage difficult commitment problems. The authors show how the principals navigated constraints and took advantage of opportunities in South Africa but have failed—so far—to do so in the other two conflicts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics in the Global South.Michael Schwartz, Howard Harris & Debra R. Comer (eds.) - 2017 - Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
Racial inequality and the imperative critique of the South African negotiated settlement.Gugu Ndlazi - 2022 - Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions 11 (3):93-104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-25

Downloads
3 (#1,732,766)

6 months
1 (#1,722,083)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Uncommon Sense.Ian Shapiro - 2024 - Yale University Press.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references