Modeling and normativity : How much revisionism can we tolerate?

Agora 20 (1):159-173 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The view of logic as model : Comments on Stewart Shapiro´s paper.Concha MartÍ & Nez - 2001 - Agora 20 (1):175-179.
Cultural diversity in nursing: How much can we tolerate.P. J. Brink - 1990 - In Joanne McCloskey Dochterman & Helen K. Grace (eds.), Current Issues in Nursing. Mosby. pp. 3--521.
Stewart Shapiro. Introduction—intensional mathematics and constructive mathematics. Intensional mathematics, edited by Stewart Shapiro, Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, vol. 113, North-Holland, Amsterdam, New York, and Oxford, 1985, pp. 1–10. - Stewart Shapiro. Epistemic and intuitionistic arithmetic. Intensional mathematics, edited by Stewart Shapiro, Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, pp. 11–46. - John Myhill. Intensional set theory. Intensional mathematics, edited by Stewart Shapiro, Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, pp. 47–61. - Nicolas D. Goodman. A genuinely intensional set theory. Intensional mathematics, edited by Stewart Shapiro, Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, pp. 63–79. - Andrej Ščedrov. Extending Godel's modal interpretation to type theory and set theory. Intensional mathematics, edited by Stewart Shapiro, Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, pp. 81–119. - Robert C. Flagg. Church's. [REVIEW]Craig A. Smorynski - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (4):1496-1499.
Stewart Shapiro and Geoffrey Hellman, eds. The History of Continua: Philosophical and Mathematical Perspectives.[author unknown] - 2021 - Philosophia Mathematica 29 (2):294-295.
In defense of true higher-order vagueness: a discussion of Stewart Shapiro on higher-order vagueness.Susanne Bobzien - 2011 - Synthese 180 (3):317-335.
How much metaphysics can theology tolerate?George Pattison - 2014 - In Hartmut von Sass & Eric E. Hall (eds.), Groundless gods: the theological prospects of post-metaphysical thought. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.
A New Interpretation of Carnap’s Logical Pluralism.Teresa Kouri - 2019 - Topoi 38 (2):305-314.
Stewart Shapiro, Vagueness in Context.M. Ledwig - 2008 - Philosophy in Review 28 (2):150.
Intensional Mathematics. Stewart Shapiro. [REVIEW]Harold T. Hodes - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (1):177-178.
I—Stewart Shapiro.Stewart Shapiro - 2005 - Supplement to the Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 79 (1):147-165.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
2 (#1,824,835)

6 months
2 (#1,448,208)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stewart Shapiro
Ohio State University

Citations of this work

Aristotle's Prior Analytics and Boole's Laws of thought.John Corcoran - 2003 - History and Philosophy of Logic. 24 (4):261-288.
Aristotle's Prior Analytics and Boole's Laws of Thought.John Corcoran - 2003 - History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (4):261-288.
Logica Dominans vs. Logica Serviens.Jaroslav Peregrin & Vladimír Svoboda - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1-25.
A verisimilitudinarian analysis of the Linda paradox.Gustavo Cevolani, Vincenzo Crupi & Roberto Festa - 2012 - VII Conference of the Spanish Society for Logic, Methodology and Philosphy of Science.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references