Leplin on essentialism-discussion

In Richard Boyd, Philip Gasper & J. D. Trout (eds.), The Philosophy of Science. MIT Press. pp. 58--4 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Leplin on essentialism.Dudley Shapere - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (4):655-677.
The method to "meaning": A reply to Leplin.Nancy J. Nersessian - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (4):678-686.
Empirical equivalence and underdetermination.Husain Sarkar - 2000 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (2):187 – 197.
Is essentialism unscientific?Jarrett Leplin - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (4):493-510.
The method to meaning-a reply to Leplin-discussion.Nancy J. Nersessian - 1991 - In Richard Boyd, Philip Gasper & J. D. Trout (eds.), The Philosophy of Science. MIT Press. pp. 58--4.
Scientific Realism.Jarrett Leplin (ed.) - 1984 - University of California.
Essence and being.Scott A. Shalkowski - 2008 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 62:49-63.
Essentialism in quantified modal logic.Thomas J. McKay - 1975 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 (4):423 - 438.
What's Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism.Marc Ereshefsky - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (5):674-685.
Cultural Transmission of Social Essentialism.Marjorie Rhodes, Sarah-Jane Leslie & Christina Tworek - 2012 - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (34):13526-13531.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-01

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references