A critical analysis of the canons of science

Philosophy of Science 7 (2):159-167 (1940)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The effort here is to use the plainest of plain language. It is assumed that the reader is familiar with the tenets of Pragmatism, Operationalism or Functionalism. If not, he may refer to innumerable philosophical works, or, if he must glance and run, he must perforce accept the fact that those terms are here used interchangeably to remind the reader of our basic idea that ideas are hypotheses.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,707

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Associate Professor of Religion.Jane Geaney - 1999 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 19 (1):1-11.
Mohist canons.Chris Fraser - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Inquiry as a transcendental activity.A. C. Genova - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):1 – 20.
Varianten der kritischen wissenschaftstheorie.Dimitri Ginev - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (1):45 - 60.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
16 (#926,955)

6 months
14 (#199,609)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references