- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Rationalism Critical and Pancritical: What Did Popper and Bartley Disagree About?
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
On Critical and Pancritical Rationalism.Antoni Diller - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (2):127-156.
Hans-Joachim Niemann, Karl Popper and the Two New Secrets of Life. [REVIEW]Sahotra Sarkar - 2017 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 7 (1):156-160.
Why advocate pancritical rationalism?Darrell Patrick Rowbottom & Otávio Bueno - 2009 - In R. S. Cohen & Z. Parusniková (eds.), Rethinking Popper, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Springer. pp. 81--89.
Yes, There Is a Problem: What Is to Be Done about the Climate for Women in Philosophy?Amy Wuest - 2013 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 3 (1):146-150.
Feyerabend and Popper on Theory Proliferation and Anomaly Import: On the Compatibility of Theoretical Pluralism and Critical Rationalism.Karim Bschir - 2015 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5 (1):24-55.
Women in the History of Philosophy of Science: What We Do and Do Not Know.Hanne Andersen - 2013 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 3 (1):136-139.
Review of John Preston: Interpreting Mach: Critical Essays. [REVIEW]Chiara Russo Krauss - 2022 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 12 (1):319-322.
Review of Karim Bschir and Jamie Shaw: Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays. [REVIEW]Rory Kent - 2022 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 12 (1):308-311.
Critical Rationalism: An Epistemological Critique.Masoud Mohammadi Alamuti - 2023 - Foundations of Science 28 (3):809-840.
Analytics
Added to PP
2024-04-25
Downloads
15 (#947,122)
6 months
15 (#234,189)
2024-04-25
Downloads
15 (#947,122)
6 months
15 (#234,189)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
The Open Society and its Enemies.Karl R. Popper - 1952 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 142:629-634.
The Retreat to Commitment.William W. Bartley - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):153-155.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-kkm7k uwo