Divorcing the puzzles: When group identities foster in-group cooperation

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue that general social psychological mechanisms can account for prosocial behavior and cooperative norms without the need for punishing Big Gods. Moreover, prosocial religions often do not prevent conflict within their religious groups. Hence, we doubt whether Big Gods and prosocial religions are more effective than alternative identities in enhancing high-level cooperation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cooperation and trust in group context.Raimo Tuomela - 2005 - Mind and Society 4 (1):49-84.
Identities for Realists.Morris P. Fiorina - 2018 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 30 (1-2):49-56.
Cooperation as Joint Action.Raimo Tuomela - 2011 - Analyse & Kritik 33 (1):65-86.
Stakeholder Identities, Trust and Cooperation: A Social Identity Perspective.Thomas Schneider - 2013 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 24:214-225.
Stakeholder Identities, Trust and Cooperation: A Social Identity Perspective.Thomas Schneider - 2013 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 24:214-225.
Cooperation and doing the best one can.Michael J. Zimmerman - 1992 - Philosophical Studies 65 (3):283 - 304.
Cooperation, Culture, and Conflict.Kim Sterelny - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (1):31-58.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-07

Downloads
7 (#1,387,247)

6 months
4 (#790,394)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references