The class of neat reducts is not elementary

Logic Journal of the IGPL 9 (4):593-628 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We solve a problem of Tarski, and his co-authors Andréka, Henkin, Monk, and Németi and confirm a conjecture of Németi. We show that for any pair of ordinals 1 < α < β, the class of α-dimensional neat reducts of β-dimensional cylindric algebras is not elementary. The construction we use when α is infinite also settles a conjecture of Tarski in the affirmative

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Modeltheoretic Solution to a Problem of Tarski.Tarek Sayed Ahmed - 2002 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 48 (3):343-355.
Polyadic and cylindric algebras of sentences.Mohamed Amer & Tarek Sayed Ahmed - 2006 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 52 (5):444-449.
On Neat Reducts and Amalgamation.Tarek Sayed-Ahmed - 2007 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 15 (1):33-39.
Not all representable cylindric algebras are neat reducts.Hajnal Andréka & István Németi - 1979 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 8 (3):145-147.
On neat embeddings of cylindric algebras.Tarek Sayed Ahmed - 2009 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 55 (6):666-668.
The class of neat reducts is not Boolean closed.Tarek Sayed Ahmed - 2008 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 37 (1):51-61.
Relation algebras from cylindric and polyadic algebras.I. Nemeti & A. Simon - 1997 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 5 (4):575-588.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
9 (#1,257,023)

6 months
6 (#526,916)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references