The Ubiquity of Public Science

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (4):62-69 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Instead of using the binary of public versus private science or autonomous versus state-sponsored science, this paper focuses on the ways in which Science, the Scientific Community, and the Scientific Enterprise have all been and are still public, serving the common good through the production, dissemination, and consumption of technoscientific innovations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Making ‘Science as a Public Good’ Meaningful.Steve Fuller - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (4):70-73.
If Science Is a Public Good, Why Do Scientists Own It?Steve Fuller - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (4):23-39.
Knowledge as a Public Good and Knowledge as a Commodity.Nico Stehr - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (4):40-51.
Is Popularization of Science Possible?Gustaaf C. Cornelis - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 37:30-33.
Science today: problem or crisis?Ralph Levinson & Jeff Thomas (eds.) - 1997 - New York: Routledge.
Democratic Values: A Better Foundation for Public Trust in Science.S. Andrew Schroeder - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (2):545-562.
Roles for Socially Engaged Philosophy of Science in Environmental Policy.Kevin C. Elliott - unknown - In David Boonin, Katrina L. Sifferd, Tyler K. Fagan, Valerie Gray Hardcastle, Michael Huemer, Daniel Wodak, Derk Pereboom, Stephen J. Morse, Sarah Tyson, Mark Zelcer, Garrett VanPelt, Devin Casey, Philip E. Devine, David K. Chan, Maarten Boudry, Christopher Freiman, Hrishikesh Joshi, Shelley Wilcox, Jason Brennan, Eric Wiland, Ryan Muldoon, Mark Alfano, Philip Robichaud, Kevin Timpe, David Livingstone Smith, Francis J. Beckwith, Dan Hooley, Russell Blackford, John Corvino, Corey McCall, Dan Demetriou, Ajume Wingo, Michael Shermer, Ole Martin Moen, Aksel Braanen Sterri, Teresa Blankmeyer Burke, Jeppe von Platz, John Thrasher, Mary Hawkesworth, William MacAskill, Daniel Halliday, Janine O’Flynn, Yoaav Isaacs, Jason Iuliano, Claire Pickard, Arvin M. Gouw, Tina Rulli, Justin Caouette, Allen Habib, Brian D. Earp, Andrew Vierra, Subrena E. Smith, Danielle M. Wenner, Lisa Diependaele, Sigrid Sterckx, G. Owen Schaefer, Markus K. Labude, Harisan Unais Nasir, Udo Schuklenk, Benjamin Zolf & Woolwine (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Public Policy. Springer Verlag. pp. 767-778.
Scientific Consensus and Public Policy.Darrin W. Belousek - 2004 - Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 4:1-35.
Public Attitude Toward Science and Science Education.John E. Penick & Robert E. Yager - 1986 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 6 (4):339-341.
Public Attitude Toward Science and Science Education.John E. Penick & Robert E. Yager - 1986 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 6 (6):535-540.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-22

Downloads
4 (#1,620,449)

6 months
4 (#778,909)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Raphael Sassower
University of Colorado, Colorado Springs

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references