Journal of Business Ethics 101 (1):143-162 (2011)

Authors
Joakim Sandberg
University of Gothenburg
Abstract
A critical issue for the future growth and impact of socially responsible investment (SRI) is whether institutional investors are legally permitted to engage in it – in particular whether it is compatible with the fiduciary duties of trustees. An ambitious report from the United Nations Environment Programme’s Finance Initiative (UNEP FI), commonly referred to as the ‘Freshfields report’, has recently given rise to considerable optimism on this issue among proponents of SRI. The present article puts the arguments of the Freshfields report into some further both empirical and critical perspective, however, and suggests that its findings do not call for very much optimism. The general argument is that while the understanding of fiduciary duty outlined by the Freshfields report seems to allow institutional investors to at least sometimes take some social or environmental considerations into account, the support it gives for SRI is notably contingent and, furthermore, it rules out exactly the kind of SRI which proponents of social responsibility and environmental sustainability should hold in highest regard – proactive cases and socially effective investment strategies. If SRI is to become an important force for corporate social responsibility through its adoption by institutional investors, then, it is suggested that legal reform is needed.
Keywords ethical investment  fiduciary duty  Fresh-fields report  institutional investors  legal reform  prudent investor rule  social effectiveness  socially responsible investment  United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-010-0714-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Three Questions About Engagement and Exclusion in Responsible Investment.Ivar Kolstad - 2016 - Business Ethics: A European Review 25 (1):45-58.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Fiduciary Duty and Socially Responsible Investing.George R. Gay - 2003 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (1):49-54.
Information Asymmetry and Socially Responsible Investment.Mark Jonathan Rhodes - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (1):145 - 151.
Some Observations on the Global Practice of Socially Responsible Investment.Donald H. Schepers - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:164-169.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-07-04

Total views
71 ( #162,215 of 2,508,035 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,508,035 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes