Reply to “Macpherson’ Commentary on Santibanez’s “Strategically wrong: bias and argumentation”

Abstract

Macpherson highlights that: “Santibanez does not take the further step of saying this explicitly. At the same time, the language used by the author throughout the paper suggests that he may assent to the claim that such lies are morally wrong: For example, even when discussing more benign forms of deception such as deceiving oneself into believing that they are a very good professor or a soccer player’s deceiving their opponents about their intent, there is reference to ‘damage’ and to the ‘victim’ of the deception.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Metaphors and Argumentation.Cristian Santibanez Yanez - 2007 - Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Biennial Conference 7.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-20

Downloads
9 (#1,249,590)

6 months
3 (#965,065)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references