- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Does Locke Think Hardness is a Primary Quality?
Locke Studies 25 (1994)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Does Locke Think Hardness is a Primary Quality?David H. Sanford - 1970 - The Locke Newsletter 1:17-29.
'Resemblance'and Locke's primary-secondary quality distinction.Benjamin Hill - 2004 - Locke Studies 4:89-122.
Locke : the primary and secondary quality distinction.Lisa Downing - 2009 - In Robin Le Poidevin, Simons Peter, McGonigal Andrew & Ross P. Cameron (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics. New York: Routledge.
Substance, reality, and primary qualities.Jonathan Bennett - 1965 - American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (1):1-17.
Are primary qualities qualities?C. J. F. Williams - 1969 - Philosophical Quarterly 19 (October):310-323.
Locke on primary and secondary qualities.Samuel C. Rickless - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (3):297-319.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-02-23
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2017-02-23
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Locke on Primary and Secondary Qualities.Marcia Ann McKelligan - 1979 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-7g5mb uwo