Kant and Heıdegger on Phenomenon: a Crıtıcal Comparıson

Journal of Philosophical Investigations 13 (26):233-246 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The phenomenon is one of the ancient words in the history of western philosophy. It is used repeatedly in the works of Plato and Aristotle, and also is in Hume, Kant, Hegel, Husserl, Heidegger, and many other philosophers. In this essay, the main topic is comparing the sense of phenomenon in Kant and Heidegger. This is important because Kant’s thoughts have caused fundamental changes in philosophy and as he claims he has created a Copernican Revolution in philosophy. It seems that his consideration of Phenomenon is, at least, one of the main elements of his Copernican Revolution, and, since he is one of the greatest modern philosophers, his understanding of the meaning of phenomenon has an essential relation to modern thought. The questions of this essay are: 1. what does phenomenon mean to Kant? And which consequences does it bring about? 2. What does phenomenon mean to Heidegger and how does he reject Kantian Phenomenon?

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Based on Transcendental Idealism, Reflecting on the Rejection of Kant's Transcendental Metaphysics.Ali Asghar Morovat & Mohammad Ali Ejeie - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 7 (13):173-194.
Thing-ing and No-Thing in Heidegger, Kant, and Laozi.Qingjie James Wang - 2016 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 15 (2):159-174.
Marxism-Leninism and the Copernican Revolution in Philosophy.Todor Pavlov - 1974 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 13 (1):4-23.
Heidegger’s Ontology and the Copernican Revolution.Charles M. Sherover - 1967 - The Monist 51 (4):559-573.
Utopia and Topo-generation: A Comparison between Kant's Subject and Heidegger's Dasein.Xiang-fei Bao - 2009 - Modern Philosophy 4:88-92.
Heidegger, Kant and Time. [REVIEW]H. J. - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (2):369-370.
Does Scheler‘s Critique on Kant‘s Understanding of A priori signify a »Ptolemiac Counter-revolution«?Wei Zhang - unknown - Phainomena 72.
The Problem of the Imagination for Subjectivity: Kant and Heidegger on the Issue of Displacement.Richard Findler - 1991 - Dissertation, Loyola University of Chicago
On the Significance of the Copernican Revolution: Transcendental Philosophy and the Object of Metaphysics.Michael J. Olson - 2018 - Con-Textos Kantianos 7:89-127.
The Distinction Between Nomenon and Phenomenon.Yusof Nouzohoor & Jalal Peikani - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 5 (9):177-199.
The Imagination in Kant and Fichte, and Some Reflections on Heidegger’s Interpretation.George J. Seidel - 2016 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 21 (2):213-223.
The Renewal of the Heidegger Kant Dialogue: Action, Thought, and Responsibility.Frank Schalow - 1992 - State University of New York Press.
Worlds apart: a Copernican critique of Kantian idealism.Julian Ryall - unknown
Metaphysical Communication of I. Kant’s Theory of Experience: M. Heidegger.Edvardas Rimkus - 2015 - Santalka: Filosofija, Komunikacija 23 (1):73-85.
Kant's Copernican Revolution. [REVIEW]Robert Hahn - 1988 - Review of Metaphysics 42 (2):375-376.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-12

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Basic Problems of Phenomenology.M. Heidegger - 1982 - In Trans Albert Hofstadter (ed.).
Kants Analytic.Benneth Jonathan - 1970 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 32 (1):123-124.

Add more references