Invisible Teaching: Søren Kierkegaard

In Ann Chinnery, Nuraan Davids, Naomi Hodgson, Kai Horsthemke, Viktor Johansson, Dirk Willem Postma, Claudia W. Ruitenberg, Paul Smeyers, Christiane Thompson, Joris Vlieghe, Hanan Alexander, Joop Berding, Charles Bingham, Michael Bonnett, David Bridges, Malte Brinkmann, Brian A. Brown, Carsten Bünger, Nicholas C. Burbules, Rita Casale, M. Victoria Costa, Brian Coyne, Renato Huarte Cuéllar, Stefaan E. Cuypers, Johan Dahlbeck, Suzanne de Castell, Doret de Ruyter, Samantha Deane, Sarah J. DesRoches, Eduardo Duarte, Denise Egéa, Penny Enslin, Oren Ergas, Lynn Fendler, Sheron Fraser-Burgess, Norm Friesen, Amanda Fulford, Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer, Stefan Herbrechter, Chris Higgins, Pádraig Hogan, Katariina Holma, Liz Jackson, Ronald B. Jacobson, Jennifer Jenson, Kerstin Jergus, Clarence W. Joldersma, Mark E. Jonas, Zdenko Kodelja, Wendy Kohli, Anna Kouppanou, Heikki A. Kovalainen, Lesley Le Grange, David Lewin, Tyson E. Lewis, Gerard Lum, Niclas Månsson, Christopher Martin & Jan Masschelein (eds.), International Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Springer Verlag. pp. 243-257 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This contribution analyses Søren Kierkegaard’s pedagogical principles within the framework of four significant questions that are part of modern pedagogical thinking. First, it analyses the ‘why’ of education. In addition to legitimating the pedagogical praxis, this question gets to the purpose of education. Any pedagogy must have a justification and a purpose; if it does not, it will lack direction and arbitrariness will ensue. Secondly, it analyses the ‘who’ of education. Who is the student who is to be the subject of the pedagogical praxis? Thirdly, it analyses the ‘how’ of education. How is the pedagogy to be carried out in practice? Fourthly, it analyses the ‘what’ of education. What should be the content of pedagogy? How does Kierkegaard, through his pedagogical perspectives, answer these questions convincingly? We know that he tried to solve complicated pedagogical issues, including the four questions this contribution analyses. Kierkegaard provides an original contribution to pedagogy, in part because he relies on ideas about irony and deception, and this contribution argues that his pedagogy or invisible teaching can be highly relevant to modern pedagogy, at least in some areas.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
3 (#1,730,340)

6 months
2 (#1,445,278)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references