- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Losses tune differently than gains: how gains and losses shape attentional scope and influence goal pursuit
Cognition and Emotion 34 (7):1439-1456 (2020)
Abstract
Research on the asymmetric effect of negative versus positive affective states on scope of attention, both at a perceptual and a conceptual level, is abundant. However,...My notes
Similar books and articles
Stake effects on ambiguity attitudes for gains and losses.Ranoua Bouchouicha, Peter Martinsson, Haileselassie Medhin & Ferdinand M. Vieider - 2017 - Theory and Decision 83 (1):19-35.
Does time inconsistency differ between gain and loss? An intra-personal comparison using a non-parametric elicitation method.Shotaro Shiba & Kazumi Shimizu - 2020 - Theory and Decision 88 (3):431-452.
Applications of prospect theory to political science.Jack S. Levy - 2003 - Synthese 135 (2):215 - 241.
Recursive expected utility and the separation of attitudes towards risk and ambiguity: an experimental study. [REVIEW]Sujoy Chakravarty & Jaideep Roy - 2008 - Theory and Decision 66 (3):199-228.
Globalization: Meaning and measurement.Charles Wolf - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (1):1-10.
A Critique of the Incentives Argument for Inequalities.Max Seeger - 2011 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):40-52.
Do financial professionals behave according to prospect theory? An experimental study.Mohammed Abdellaoui, Han Bleichrodt & Hilda Kammoun - 2013 - Theory and Decision 74 (3):411-429.
Do gains and losses really play a role in the framing effect?Konstantinos Katsikopolous & Annika Wallin - unknown
Framing From Experience: Cognitive Processes and Predictions of Risky Choice.Cleotilde Gonzalez & Katja Mehlhorn - 2016 - Cognitive Science 40 (5):1163-1191.
Beyond Gains and Losses: In Search of "Winning Losers".Andrzej Rychard - 1996 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 63.
Beyond gains and losses: In search of'winning losers'.Rychard Andrzej - 1996 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 63 (2).
Choices Under Ambiguity With Familiar And Unfamiliar Outcomes.Marcello Basili, Alain Chateauneuf & Fulvio Fontini - 2005 - Theory and Decision 58 (2):195-207.
The evaluation of pollution: Balancing gains and losses. [REVIEW]Richard Stone - 1972 - Minerva 10 (3):412-425.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-05-07
Downloads
14 (#990,520)
6 months
8 (#361,431)
2020-05-07
Downloads
14 (#990,520)
6 months
8 (#361,431)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
References found in this work
Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought‐action repertoires.Barbara L. Fredrickson & Christine Branigan - 2005 - Cognition and Emotion 19 (3):313-332.
Anxiety and Performance: The Processing Efficiency Theory.Michael W. Eysenck & Manuel G. Calvo - 1992 - Cognition and Emotion 6 (6):409-434.
The motivational dimensional model of affect: Implications for breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorisation.Philip Gable & Eddie Harmon-Jones - 2010 - Cognition and Emotion 24 (2):322-337.
Emotion and memory narrowing: A review and goal-relevance approach.Linda J. Levine & Robin S. Edelstein - 2009 - Cognition and Emotion 23 (5):833-875.
Unconscious reward cues increase invested effort, but do not change speed–accuracy tradeoffs.Erik Bijleveld, Ruud Custers & Henk Aarts - 2010 - Cognition 115 (2):330-335.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-wg6s5 uwo