Jean de La Rochelle’s Formulation of the Distinction between Being and Essence

Maynooth Philosophical Papers 4:123-129 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The distinction between ‘being’ and ‘essence’ arose in the elaboration of the theory of universal hylomorphism, defended by the Franciscans, which maintained that there is a composition of matter and form in all beings other than the First cause. This paper focuses on a formula which Jean de La Rochelle (1190/ 1200-1245) borrows from Boethius (c. 480-524) to explain how the ‘being’ of the soul is distinct from the ‘essence’ of the soul. It concludes by raising the question whether Jean’s formulation anticipates that of St Thomas Aquinas’s (1224-1274) in his early writings on De Ente et Essentia.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Metaphysical Argument for God’s Existence.Krzysztof Ośko - 2019 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 67 (4):53-69.
The Esse/Essentia Argument in Aquinas's De ente et essentia.Scott Charles MacDonald - 1984 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (2):157-72.
A Cosmological Argument.Kathryn Kreiling Rombs - 2002 - Dissertation, Fordham University

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-08

Downloads
7 (#1,405,758)

6 months
5 (#838,466)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references