Does inequality matter—for its own sake?

Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (1):225-243 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a simple essay. It raises a familiar question about equality, adduces a very small amount of empirical evidence about the social consequences of equality as distinct from prosperity, and broods on the difficulty of providing a really persuasive answer to the question raised. I begin with the view that there simply cannot be anything intrinsically wrong with inequality, move on to the view that there are extrinsic reasons for anxiety, dividing these into conceptual and empirical reasons, though without any great commitment to the clarity of that distinction in this context, and end with some reflections on recent social and political theory. The essay thus begins with what I hope are clear and (what I am sure are) very simple thoughts, before muddying the water pretty thoroughly thereafter.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
55 (#289,423)

6 months
2 (#1,188,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Social welfare, the neo-conservative turn and educational opportunity.Michele S. Moses - 2004 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 38 (2):275–286.
Two Dogmas of Egalitarianism.Douglas B. Rasmussen & Douglas J. Den Uyl - 2020 - Journal des Economistes Et des Etudes Humaines 26 (1).
Social Welfare, the Neo-conservative Turn and Educational Opportunity.Michele S. Moses - 2004 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 38 (2):275-286.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references