What was the crime of Galileo?

Annals of Science 52 (4):403-410 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Summary In the trial of Galileo there is a small but significant discrepancy between the text of his condemnation by the Holy Office and the text of his recantation, which has been generally overlooked or ignored. The offence that he was required to recant was more serious than the one of which he had been found guilty. The most plausible explanation seems to be that the two texts were drawn up independently of each other by the Inquisitors and the Pope respectively, and that the latter wished to deal more harshly with Galileo than the former. There is some independent evidence for this supposition

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Jesuit And Secular Astronomers.Marcin WrÓbel - 2009 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 4 (2):133-149.
The Crime of Galileo.Gavin Ardley - 1958 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 8:160-165.
Galileo and the school of padua.Neal Ward Gilbert - 1963 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 1 (2):223-231.
Galileo Heretic.Pietro Redondi - 1987 - Princeton University Press.
The Roman Inquisition's precept to Galileo.Thomas F. Mayer - 2010 - British Journal for the History of Science 43 (3):327-351.
Galileo's French correspondents.Frederic J. Baumgartner - 1988 - Annals of Science 45 (2):169-182.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
29 (#135,560)

6 months
2 (#1,816,284)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations