Good and Evil in Recent Discussion: Defending the Concept of Evil

Zeitschrift Für Ethik Und Moralphilosophie 5 (1):77-82 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper addresses the question of whether the concept of evil is philosophically adequate. It sets out a secular conception of evil that is sufficiently clear to be used in philosophical theorising. Evil, so conceived, is not merely a fiction or an illusion, but is a moral property possessed by some actions and some persons in the real world. While several philosophers have claimed that it is inescapably dangerous to use the concept of evil, the reality is that the concept of evil, when used carefully, is not prohibitively dangerous. Evil actions are not merely the opposite of good actions. Rather evil actions are are a small subset of extreme moral wrongs.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-13

Downloads
23 (#705,674)

6 months
7 (#491,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Luke Russell
Catholic University of America

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references