Research Ethics Committees and the Legality of the Protocol: A Rejoinder and a Challenge to the Department of Health

Research Ethics 5 (1):33-36 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is a response to the letter from the Department of Health that was published in the previous edition of the Research Ethics Review upon the matter of the legal duty of the research ethics committees. It also deals briefly with the article published in the current edition of Research Ethics Review by Colin Parker on what appears to be the same topic.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/174701610900500111

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Should research ethics committees be told how to think?G. M. Sayers - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (1):39-42.
Illegality in the Research Protocol: The Duty of Research Ethics Committees under the 2001 Clinical Trials Directive.Christopher Roy-Toole - 2008 - Research Ethics 4 (3):111-116.
The Legal Research Committee: A Response to Roy-Toole.Colin Parker - 2009 - Research Ethics 5 (1):30-32.
Qualitative health research and procedural ethics: An interview study to investigate researchers’ ways of navigating the demands of medical research ethics committees in Germany.Sarah Potthoff, Fee Roth & Matthé Scholten - 2024 - Research Ethics 20 (2):388-410.
Using quality indicators to assess human research protection programs at the Department of Veterans Affairs.M. F. Tsan, Y. Nguyen & R. Brooks - 2013 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 35 (1):10-14.
Research ethics review committees and how they operate.Cecilia V. Tomas - 2008 - In Angeles Tan-Alora (ed.), Introduction to Health Research Ethics: Philippine Health Research Ethics Board. Philippine National Health Research System.
Module five: Implementation of ethics review.Ames Dhai - 2005 - Developing World Bioethics 5 (1):73–91.
Research ethics committee audit: differences between committees.M. E. Redshaw, A. Harris & J. D. Baum - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (2):78-82.
WITHDRAWN—Administrative Duplicate Publication: Research ethics committees: The ineligibles.Stephen Humphreys - 2016 - Research Ethics.
WITHDRAWN—Administrative Duplicate Publication: Research ethics committees: The ineligibles.Stephen Humphreys - 2016 - Sage Publications Ltd: Research Ethics.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
7 (#1,407,052)

6 months
4 (#1,006,062)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Correspondence.[author unknown] - 2008 - Research Ethics 4 (4):165-166.

Add more references