Relevant logics and their semantics remain viable and undamaged by Lewis's equivocation charge

Topoi 2 (2):205-215 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Subintuitionistic Logics.Greg Restall - 1994 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (1):116-129.
Simplified semantics for relevant logics (and some of their rivals).Greg Restall - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (5):481 - 511.
“Four-Valued” Semantics for the Relevant Logic R.Edwin D. Mares - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (3):327-341.
A relevant theory of conditionals.Edwin D. Mares & André Fuhrmann - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (6):645 - 665.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
77 (#215,760)

6 months
11 (#237,740)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Relevant Logics and Their Rivals.Richard Routley, Val Plumwood, Robert K. Meyer & Ross T. Brady - 1982 - Ridgeview. Edited by Richard Sylvan & Ross Brady.
A useful four-valued logic.N. D. Belnap - 1977 - In J. M. Dunn & G. Epstein (eds.), Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic. D. Reidel.
Logic for equivocators.David Lewis - 1982 - Noûs 16 (3):431-441.
Moral dilemmas.E. J. Lemmon - 1962 - Philosophical Review 71 (2):139-158.

View all 25 references / Add more references