Why content must be a matter of truth conditions

Philosophical Quarterly 39 (156):257-275 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is argued that if, with Dummett, we see assertion as an act governed by conditions of correctness which makes a claim to the effect that these conditions are met, then the conditions of correctness that determine its content must have the impersonal character of a requirement of truth, rather than the speaker-relative character of a requirement of justification or assertibility. For otherwise it would be impossible for different speakers to use the same words to make an assertion with the same content.

Similar books and articles

Revising the logic of logical revision.J. Salerno - 2000 - Philosophical Studies 99 (2):211-227.
The transparency of truth.ME Kalderon - 1997 - Mind 106 (423):475-497.
Thing talk moonlighting.Mark Crimmins - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):83 - 98.
Truth-Bearers and the Unsaid.Stephen Barker - 2011 - In Ken Turner (ed.), Making Semantics Pragmatic. Cambridge University Press.
Truth-Conditional Pragmatics.Anne Bezuidenhout - 2002 - Philosophical Perspectives 16:105-134.
Terminological reflections of an enlightened contextualist. [REVIEW]Robert J. Stainton - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (2):460–468.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
429 (#44,379)

6 months
83 (#53,399)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Angus Ross
University of East Anglia

Citations of this work

Rationality and the Reactive Attitudes.Angus Ross - 2008 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 4 (1):45-58.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references