On the Intrinsic Nature of the Physical

In Stuart R. Hameroff, Alfred W. Kaszniak & A. C. Scott (eds.), Toward a Science of Consciousness III. MIT Press (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In its original context Hawking was writing about the significance of physics for questions about God's existence and responsibility for creation. I am co-opting the sentiment for another purpose, though. As stated Hawking could equally be directing the question at concerns about the seemingly abstract information physics conveys about the world, and the full body of facts contained in the substance of the world. Would even a complete and adequate physics tell us all the general facts about the stuff the world is made of? In this chapter I am going to argue that the answer is "no." I am also going to argue that the missing facts are like the kinds of facts we can use to cross the explanatory gap. I am going to argue, in short, that we have reasons to re-enchant matter that are independent of the mind-body problem. In a recent anthology on consciousness (1997) G

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
3 (#1,710,044)

6 months
1 (#1,467,486)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gregg Rosenberg
Indiana University

Citations of this work

Mind and Being: The Primacy of Panpsychism.Galen Strawson - 2016 - In Godehard Brüntrup & Ludwig Jaskolla (eds.), Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 000-00.
Pleading ignorance in response to experiential primitivism.Raamy Majeed - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (1):251-269.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references