Measuring cognitive universals and cultural particulars

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):586-587 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A reanalysis of Atran's data is presented in which the comparison between Itzaj and Michigan animal names is represented in spatial rather than taxonomic form. Similarity among all subjects is also represented in spatial terms. Finally, culturally shared knowledge between the two cultures is shown to be about ten times larger than the culture-specific component unique to each culture.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Culture in cognitive science.Don Dedrick - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):571-572.
Itzaj Maya folkbiological taxonomy: cognitive universals and cultural particulars.Scott Atran - 1999 - In Douglas L. Medin & Scott Atran (eds.), Folkbiology. MIT Press. pp. 119--213.
Individual data and clear assumptions about movement.Jan E. Holly - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):313-314.
Spatial semiosis in culture.Leonid Tchertov - 2002 - Sign Systems Studies 30 (2):441-453.
Exhuming similarity.Dedre Gentner - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):669-669.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
5 (#1,562,871)

6 months
14 (#200,872)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references