Why Should a Physical Object Take on the Role of Truth-Bearer?

Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 6:115-125 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The topic of this paper I would like to divide into two other questions than that of its title. The first question is the historical one and sounds like this: Why had Tarski chosen physical objects as truth-bearers in his original work from 1933 about truth in formalized languages?1 This historical problem may be still of importance not only from a historical point of view. Tarski’s truth-definition is still seen as one of undeniable importance for any contemporary philosophical analysis of truth

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,420

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
24 (#657,236)

6 months
4 (#1,045,477)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?