A Medieval Approach to Keith Ward’s Christ and the Cosmos

Philosophia Christi 18 (2):323-332 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Christ and the Cosmos Keith Ward hopes to “reformulate” the conciliar statements of the Trinity and Incarnation since they cannot serve our post-Enlightenment, scientific age. I dispute Ward’s motivation, noting that the differences in perspective to which he points may not be as radical as he supposes. And his “reformulation” has worrisome consequences. I am especially concerned at his point that Jesus, while very special and perfectly good, is only human. This undermines free will theodicy, and, much more troubling, makes global Christian practice for two millennia idolatry.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Responses to Essays on Christ and the Cosmos.Keith Ward - 2016 - Philosophia Christi 18 (2):387-391.
Comments on Keith Ward’s Christ and the Cosmos.Stephen T. Davis - 2016 - Philosophia Christi 18 (2):307-312.
Response to Keith Ward, Christ and the Cosmos.Richard Swinburne - 2016 - Philosophia Christi 18 (2):297-305.
Medieval views of the cosmos.Evelyn Edson - 2004 - Oxford: Bodleian Library, University of Oxford. Edited by Emilie Savage-Smith.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-10

Downloads
25 (#629,577)

6 months
9 (#300,433)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Katherin Rogers
University of Delaware

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references