Measurement and statistics: Towards a clarification of the theory of "permissible statistics"

Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):229-243 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Much of the criticism of Stevens's criterion for permissible statistics as applied to measurement data results from a lack of clarity in Stevens's position. In this paper set-theoretical notions have been used to clarify that position. We define a sig-function as a function defined on numerical assignments. If A and R are empirical and numerical relational systems, respectively, then a sig-function F is constant on A with respect to R if, and only if, the value of F is the same for all numerical assignments for A with respect to R. Using these notions we prove rigorously certain generalizations of Stevens's results

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

‘‘Describing our whole experience’’: The statistical philosophies of W. F. R. Weldon and Karl Pearson.Charles H. Pence - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (4):475-485.
A model with no magic set.Krzysztof Ciesielski & Saharon Shelah - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1467-1490.
A Model With No Magic Set.Krzysztof Ciesielski & Saharon Shelah - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1467-1490.
Suppes’s outlines of an empirical measurement theory.Marcel Boumans - 2016 - Journal of Economic Methodology 23 (3):305-315.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
130 (#139,200)

6 months
7 (#594,125)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Additive scales and statistics.C. J. Burke - 1953 - Psychological Review 60 (1):73-75.

Add more references