Expert evidence in Canadian criminal proceedings

In Helen Reece (ed.), Law and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 175 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Canadian Scholars on Criminal Responsibility.Stephen P. Garvey - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (2):351-364.
The law of evidence and the protection of rights.Hamish Stewart - 2012 - In François Tanguay-Renaud & James Stribopoulos (eds.), Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Criminal Law. Hart Publishing.
Entrapment as an Intrument in the Course of Making Evidence in Criminal Procedure.Raimundas Jurka - 2013 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 20 (1):249-265.
How to consult an expert? Opinion versus evidence.Thomas Lanzi & Jerome Mathis - 2011 - Theory and Decision 70 (4):447-474.
Why suppress the truth? U.s., Canadian and English approaches to the exclusion of illegally obtained real evidence in criminal cases.Stephen Kines - 1996 - Res Publica 2 (1):147-162.
How Many Interpreters Does It Take to Interpret the Testimony of an Expert Witness? A Case Study of Interpreter-Mediated Expert Witness Examination.Jieun Lee - 2015 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 28 (1):189-208.
Translating Scientific Evidence into the Language of the ‘Folk’: Executive Function as Capacity-Responsibility.Katrina L. Sifferd - 2013 - In Nicole A. Vincent (ed.), Legal Responsibility and Neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
Conhecimento por especialista, evidência e informação.Tommaso Piazza - 2010 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 55 (2):42-59.
The Criminal Trial, the Rule of Law and the Exclusion of Unlawfully Obtained Evidence.Hock Lai Ho - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (1):109-131.
Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Criminal Law.Francois Tanguay-Renaud & James Stribopoulos (eds.) - 2012 - Hart Publishing.
Two conceptions of equality before the (criminal) law.Malcolm Thorburn - 2012 - In François Tanguay-Renaud & James Stribopoulos (eds.), Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Criminal Law. Hart Publishing.
Rethinking Criminal Law. [REVIEW]Andrew Botterell - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 22:93-112.
Individual Emergencies and the Rule of Criminal Law.François Tanguay-Renaud - 2012 - In François Tanguay-Renaud & James Stribopoulos (eds.), Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Criminal Law. Hart Publishing.
Mental disorder and the instability of blame in criminal law.Benjamin L. Berger - 2012 - In François Tanguay-Renaud & James Stribopoulos (eds.), Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Criminal Law. Hart Publishing.
Paul Roberts and Adrian Zuckerman: Criminal Evidence: Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2nd ed, 2010, 776 pp, Paperback, ISBN 978-0-19-923164-5 £33.99. [REVIEW]Hock Lai Ho - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (2):225-229.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references