A Class of Implicative Expansions of Belnap-Dunn Logic in which Boolean Negation is Definable

Journal of Philosophical Logic 52 (3):915-938 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Belnap and Dunn’s well-known 4-valued logic FDE is an interesting and useful non-classical logic. FDE is defined by using conjunction, disjunction and negation as the sole propositional connectives. Then the question of expanding FDE with an implication connective is of course of great interest. In this sense, some implicative expansions of FDE have been proposed in the literature, among which Brady’s logic BN4 seems to be the preferred option of relevant logicians. The aim of this paper is to define a class of implicative expansions of FDE in whose elements Boolean negation is definable, whence strong logics such as the paraconsistent and paracomplete logic PŁ4 and BN4 itself are definable, in addition to classical propositional logic.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

New Essays on Belnap-­Dunn Logic.Hitoshi Omori & Heinrich Wansing (eds.) - 2019 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
Basic Quasi-Boolean Expansions of Relevance Logics.Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 50 (4):727-754.
Boolean deductive systems of BL-algebras.Esko Turunen - 2001 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 40 (6):467-473.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-11

Downloads
17 (#865,183)

6 months
8 (#353,767)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Gemma Robles
Universidad de León
José M. Méndez
Universidad de Salamanca

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

New Essays on Belnap-­Dunn Logic.Hitoshi Omori & Heinrich Wansing (eds.) - 2019 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
Partiality and its dual.J. Michael Dunn - 2000 - Studia Logica 66 (1):5-40.

View all 23 references / Add more references