Rebooting the bootstrap argument: Two puzzles for bootstrap theories of concept development

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):145 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Origin of Concepts sets out an impressive defense of the view that children construct entirely new systems of concepts. We offer here two questions about this theory. First, why doesn't the bootstrapping process provide a pattern for translating between the old and new systems, contradicting their claimed incommensurability? Second, can the bootstrapping process properly distinguish meaning change from belief change?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
53 (#292,995)

6 months
4 (#1,005,811)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

The origin of concepts.Susan Carey - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A Border Dispute. The Place of Logic in Psychology.Jay L. Garfield - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (1):314.
Radical concept nativism.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 2002 - Cognition 86 (1):25-55.
Concepts: a potboiler.Jerry Fodor - 1994 - Cognition 50 (1-3):95-113.

View all 7 references / Add more references