- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Giving the boot to the bootstrap: How not to learn the natural numbers
Cognition 101 (3):B51-B60 (2006)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
How to Learn the Natural Numbers: Inductive Inference and the Acquisition of Number Concepts.Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence - 2008 - Cognition 106 (2):924-939.
Can statistical learning bootstrap the integers?Lance J. Rips, Jennifer Asmuth & Amber Bloomfield - 2013 - Cognition 128 (3):320-330.
Do children learn the integers by induction?Lance J. Rips, Jennifer Asmuth & Amber Bloomfield - 2008 - Cognition 106 (2):940-951.
From numerical concepts to concepts of number.Lance J. Rips, Amber Bloomfield & Jennifer Asmuth - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):623-642.
From magnitude to natural numbers: A developmental neurocognitive perspective.Roi Cohen Kadosh & Vincent Walsh - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):647-648.
Learning natural numbers is conceptually different than learning counting numbers.Dwight Read - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):667-668.
The innate schema of natural numbers does not explain historical, cultural, and developmental differences.Marie-Pascale Noël, Jacques Grégoire, Gaëlle Meert & Xavier Seron - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):664-665.
Why cardinalities are the “natural” natural numbers.Mathieu Le Corre - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):659-659.
What is still needed? On nativist proposals for acquiring concepts of natural numbers.Wen-Chi Chiang - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):646-647.
Reference to numbers in natural language.Friederike Moltmann - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (3):499 - 536.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
30 (#521,181)
6 months
6 (#512,819)
2014-01-20
Downloads
30 (#521,181)
6 months
6 (#512,819)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles.Mathieu Le Corre & Susan Carey - 2007 - Cognition 105 (2):395-438.
Bootstrapping of integer concepts: the stronger deviant-interpretation challenge.Markus Pantsar - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):5791-5814.
Does learning to count involve a semantic induction?Kathryn Davidson, Kortney Eng & David Barner - 2012 - Cognition 123 (1):162-173.
References found in this work
Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group.Pierre Pica, Cathy Lemer, Véronique Izard & Stanislas Dehaene - 2004 - Science 306 (5695):499-503.
Preverbal and verbal counting and computation.C. R. Gallistel & Rochel Gelman - 1992 - Cognition 44 (1-2):43-74.
Evidence Against Empiricist Accounts of the Origins of Numerical Knowledge.Karen Wynn - 1992 - Mind and Language 7 (4):315-332.
Cognitive Foundations of Arithmetic: Evolution and Ontogenisis.Susan Carey - 2002 - Mind and Language 16 (1):37-55.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-l2pxr uwo